Editorial Policy

SupplementDoctor maintains strict editorial independence. Our reviews, ratings, and recommendations are based solely on scientific evidence, product quality, and our assessment of value—never on advertising relationships or payments from supplement manufacturers.

Our editorial team operates completely separately from our business and advertising teams. No advertiser or sponsor has any input into our editorial content, and no payment can influence our ratings or recommendations.

All content published on SupplementDoctor adheres to the following standards:

• Evidence-Based: Every health claim must be supported by peer-reviewed scientific research. We cite our sources and link to original studies whenever possible.
• Accurate: We verify all facts and figures before publication. If we make an error, we correct it promptly and transparently.
• Balanced: We present both benefits and risks of supplements. We do not exaggerate benefits or minimize potential side effects.
• Current: We regularly review and update content to reflect new research. All articles display publication and update dates.
• Clear: We write in plain language that is accessible to general audiences while maintaining scientific accuracy.

All health-related content is reviewed by qualified healthcare professionals before publication. Our medical review board includes:

• Board-certified physicians
• Licensed pharmacists
• Registered dietitians
• PhD researchers in relevant fields

Medical reviewers verify the accuracy of health claims, ensure appropriate safety information is included, and confirm that content meets clinical standards. Each reviewed article displays the name and credentials of the medical reviewer.

We believe transparency builds trust. To that end:

• We clearly disclose all affiliate relationships and how we earn revenue
• We publish our complete review methodology
• We identify the author and medical reviewer for each article
• We display publication and update dates on all content
• We welcome feedback and corrections from readers and experts

We strive for accuracy, but mistakes can happen. When we identify an error:

• Minor corrections (typos, formatting) are made without notation
• Factual corrections are noted at the bottom of the article with the date of correction
• Significant corrections that affect conclusions or recommendations are prominently noted at the top of the article

If you believe you have found an error in our content, please contact us at corrections@supplementdoctor.com.